Commodity Feed
Signal context · 35
  • ▲United States · EIA reports U.S. fuel ethanol production of 1,053 thousand barrels per day, up 46 week on weekHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▼United States · Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ◆United States · Weekly reported exports — United StatesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ◆Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn second crop production — Brazil national totalPublished geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▲United States · Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▼United States · Us fuel ethanol production — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▼United States · Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▲Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn second crop yield — Brazil national totalBrazil national total; no state allocation or facility location is supported.
  • ▼Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn first crop area — Brazil national totalBrazil national total; no state allocation or facility location is supported.
  • ◆Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn first crop production — Brazil national totalPublished geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▼United States · Us fuel ethanol production — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▲Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn first crop yield — Brazil national totalBrazil national total; no state allocation or facility location is supported.
  • ▼United States · Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▼United States · Us fuel ethanol production — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▲United States · Us fuel ethanol production — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ◆United States · Outstanding sales — United StatesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ◆United States · Net sales — United StatesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▼Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn second crop area — Brazil national totalBrazil national total; no state allocation or facility location is supported.
  • ◆United States · Accumulated exports — United StatesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▲United States · Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ▲United States · Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ◆United States selected states · Corn harvested percent — United States selected statesPublished geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▼United States selected states · Corn mature percent — United States selected statesSource reports an aggregate for the selected-state group, not state-level values; no individual state feature is assigned.
  • ◆United States · Outstanding sales — United StatesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▼United States · Us fuel ethanol production — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ◆United States · Net sales — United StatesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▲United States · Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United StatesHistorical assessment. United States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ◆United States · Accumulated exports — United StatesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ◆United States selected states · Corn harvested percent — United States selected statesHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▼United States selected states · Corn mature percent — United States selected statesHistorical assessment. Source reports an aggregate for the selected-state group, not state-level values; no individual state feature is assigned.
  • ◆World · World maize production forecast — WorldPublished geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ▲United States national total · Us corn indicated disappearance — United States national totalUnited States national aggregate; do not distribute to subnational regions or facilities.
  • ◆United States national total · Us corn stocks in all positions — United States national totalPublished geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ◆Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn second crop production — Brazil national totalHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
  • ◆Brazil national total · Conab brazil corn first crop production — Brazil national totalHistorical assessment. Published geographic scope; no source-supported point or region link is available. No facility coordinate is inferred.
Map scope & source notes

Map layers are separate by commodity mechanism: 31 U.S. corn production states (USDA 2026 forecast), Brazil first crop, Brazil second crop (19 and 19 positive-production ADM1 regions from CONAB 2025/26 September estimates), and 21 U.S. fuel-ethanol processing states (EIA operating plant capacity as of January 1, 2026). U.S. production is in thousand bushels, Brazil crop estimates are in thousand metric tons, and ethanol capacity is in million gallons/year; map layers and crop periods are not additive or directly comparable. State boundaries identify reporting or processing regions, not planted fields or individual plant footprints. Ethanol plant feedstocks are not reported by state feature. Brazil first- and second-crop estimates are kept in separate layers. Other countries and confirmed facility coordinates are not mapped. Latest dated crop progress and September rainfall context are available in the Iowa popup; rainfall has no directional Signal.

Corn Signals134 signals · Refresh page for updatesView all signals
StatusSignalSourceDetected
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d2 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm_conus_d2_plus_percent: 30.33 percent_of_CONUS_area for 2026-10-13

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d0 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm_conus_d0_plus_percent: 74.54 percent_of_CONUS_area for 2026-10-13

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d2 or worse — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: drought_d2_or_worse 43.5 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d1 or worse — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: drought_d1_or_worse 48.77 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +3.99.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d0 or worse — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: drought_d0_or_worse 57.72 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +2.91.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d1 or worse — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: drought_d1_or_worse 20.9 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +11.31.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d0 or worse — United States, Indiana
Fact & assessment

Indiana: drought_d0_or_worse 18.8 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +7.6.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Indiana · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d0 or worse — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: drought_d0_or_worse 69.56 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +8.83.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d0 or worse — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: drought_d0_or_worse 36.87 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +2.09.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Drought d2 or worse — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: drought_d2_or_worse 30.32 percent of state land area at 2026-10-13; comparator difference +5.22.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
USDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDUUSDMDATASERVICES.UNL.EDU ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d3 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm_conus_d3_plus_percent: 9.79 percent_of_CONUS_area for 2026-10-13

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d4 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm_conus_d4_plus_percent: 1.3 percent_of_CONUS_area for 2026-10-13

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
ObservedHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d1 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm_conus_d1_plus_percent: 53.73 percent_of_CONUS_area for 2026-10-13

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
ObservedMixed?
Corn harvested percent — United States selected states
Fact & assessment

corn_harvested_percent: 33.0 percent for 2026-10-12

Harvest progress affects the timing of newly available grain. If faster than the same-week norm it leans against near-term scarcity; if behind, it can delay supply.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Week-on-week progress and the five-year-normal comparison point in opposite directions; progress does not measure harvested volume or national stocks.

Harvest progress affects the timing of newly available grain. If faster than the same-week norm it leans against near-term scarcity; if behind, it can delay supply.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States selected states · USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORNUSDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
ObservedDownward?
Corn mature percent — United States selected states
Fact & assessment

corn_mature_percent: 91.0 percent for 2026-10-12

More of the selected-state crop is mature, reducing unresolved field-production risk and potentially bringing supply forward; this is progress, not bushels produced.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: The report's current 91% is near its five-year comparator, harvest is not complete, and later availability, yield and demand still matter.

More of the selected-state crop is mature, reducing unresolved field-production risk and potentially bringing supply forward; this is progress, not bushels produced.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States selected states · USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORNUSDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Corn condition good excellent percent — United States selected states
Fact & assessment

corn_condition_good_excellent_percent: 56.0 percent for 2026-10-11

Good-plus-excellent crop condition informs remaining yield risk, but the selected-state percentage is not a production estimate.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: The crop is late-season and mostly mature; the report's condition score is not acreage/yield weighted and cannot quantify remaining production.

Good-plus-excellent crop condition informs remaining yield risk, but the selected-state percentage is not a production estimate.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States selected states · USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORNUSDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: progress_harvested 11.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference -11.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, Iowa
Fact & assessment

Iowa: progress_harvested 14.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference -20.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Iowa · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress mature — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: progress_mature 89.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference +6.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, South Dakota
Fact & assessment

South Dakota: progress_harvested 15.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference -16.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, South Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, Nebraska
Fact & assessment

Nebraska: progress_harvested 27.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference -8.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Nebraska · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, Minnesota
Fact & assessment

Minnesota: progress_harvested 25.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference -8.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Minnesota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress mature — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: progress_mature 68.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference -14.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: progress_harvested 16.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference -2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress mature — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: progress_mature 96.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: progress_harvested 23.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: progress_harvested 64.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress mature — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: progress_mature 90.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference +5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress harvested — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: progress_harvested 51.0 percent at 2026-10-11; comparator difference +7.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Iowa corn harvest: 14% complete, 20 points below normal
Fact & assessment

USDA NASS reported Iowa corn harvest at 14% for the week ending 2026-10-11, versus the 2021-2025 same-week average of 34% (20 percentage points below). The previous week was 7%. Crop year: 2026.

The archived fact is verifiable, but the required current comparator or price-relevant linked data are absent.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Next check: A newer official source vintage; Next scheduled source release

Iowa, United States · USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics ServiceUSDA National Agricultural Statistics Service ↗
ObservedHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol ending stocks: 23942.0 thousand_barrels for 2026-10-09

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Stocks also reflect refinery/seasonal timing; output rose in the latest period and no margin or demand series is joined.

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKSEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
ObservedHistorical Upward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol production — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol production: 1065.0 thousand_barrels_per_day for 2026-10-09

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTIONEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
ObservedHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Weekly reported exports — United States
Fact & assessment

weekly_reported_exports: 1362.6 thousand_metric_tons for 2026-10-08

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Commitments are not port inspections or customs shipments; cancellations, destination changes, futures expectations, domestic demand and competing origins can offset.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORNUSDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
ObservedHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Outstanding sales — United States
Fact & assessment

outstanding_sales: 11901.4 thousand_metric_tons for 2026-10-08

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Commitments are not port inspections or customs shipments; cancellations, destination changes, futures expectations, domestic demand and competing origins can offset.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORNUSDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
ObservedHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Net sales — United States
Fact & assessment

net_sales: 1122.4 thousand_metric_tons for 2026-10-08

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Commitments are not port inspections or customs shipments; cancellations, destination changes, futures expectations, domestic demand and competing origins can offset.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORNUSDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
ObservedHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Accumulated exports — United States
Fact & assessment

accumulated_exports: 8764.2 thousand_metric_tons for 2026-10-08

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Commitments are not port inspections or customs shipments; cancellations, destination changes, futures expectations, domestic demand and competing origins can offset.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORNUSDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
U.S. Drought Monitor reports D2-or-higher conditions across 31.45% of CONUS area
Fact & assessment

For October 6, 2026, U.S. Drought Monitor statistics reported D2-or-higher drought across 31.45% of the contiguous U.S. area.

The archived fact is verifiable, but the required current comparator or price-relevant linked data are absent.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Next check: A newer official source vintage; Next scheduled source release

Contiguous United States (CONUS) · U.S. Drought Monitor ↗
U.S. Drought MonitorU.S. Drought Monitor ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d3 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm conus d3 plus percent: 9.87 percent_of_CONUS_area; Continental United States (CONUS); 2026-10-06.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d4 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm conus d4 plus percent: 1.15 percent_of_CONUS_area; Continental United States (CONUS); 2026-10-06.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d1 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm conus d1 plus percent: 55.21 percent_of_CONUS_area; Continental United States (CONUS); 2026-10-06.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Usdm conus d0 plus percent — Continental United States (CONUS)
Fact & assessment

usdm conus d0 plus percent: 75.83 percent_of_CONUS_area; Continental United States (CONUS); 2026-10-06.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Most severity bands eased week on week, while D4 increased slightly; precipitation, harvest stage and corn-area weighting are not in this statistic.

The measured variable is drought-area share over all CONUS; this is not corn-acreage exposure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Continental United States (CONUS) · US DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
US DROUGHT MONITORUS DROUGHT MONITOR ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Corn condition good excellent percent — United States selected states
Fact & assessment

corn condition good excellent percent: 54.0 percent; United States selected states; 2026-10-04.

Good-plus-excellent crop condition informs remaining yield risk, but the selected-state percentage is not a production estimate.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: The crop is late-season and mostly mature; the report's condition score is not acreage/yield weighted and cannot quantify remaining production.

Good-plus-excellent crop condition informs remaining yield risk, but the selected-state percentage is not a production estimate.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States selected states · USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORNUSDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Corn harvested percent — United States selected states
Fact & assessment

corn harvested percent: 23.0 percent; United States selected states; 2026-10-04.

Harvest progress affects the timing of newly available grain. If faster than the same-week norm it leans against near-term scarcity; if behind, it can delay supply.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Week-on-week progress and the five-year-normal comparison point in opposite directions; progress does not measure harvested volume or national stocks.

Harvest progress affects the timing of newly available grain. If faster than the same-week norm it leans against near-term scarcity; if behind, it can delay supply.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States selected states · USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORNUSDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Corn mature percent — United States selected states
Fact & assessment

corn mature percent: 83.0 percent; United States selected states; 2026-10-04.

More of the selected-state crop is mature, reducing unresolved field-production risk and potentially bringing supply forward; this is progress, not bushels produced.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: The report's current 91% is near its five-year comparator, harvest is not complete, and later availability, yield and demand still matter.

More of the selected-state crop is mature, reducing unresolved field-production risk and potentially bringing supply forward; this is progress, not bushels produced.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States selected states · USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORNUSDA NASS CROP PROGRESS CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical Upward?Historical assessment
EIA reports U.S. fuel ethanol production of 1,053 thousand barrels per day, up 46 week on week
Fact & assessment

For the week ending October 2, 2026, EIA reported U.S. fuel ethanol production of 1,053 thousand barrels per day, 46 thousand barrels per day above the 1,007 reported for September 25, 2026.

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Next check: A newer official source vintage; Next scheduled source release

United States · U.S. Energy Information Administration ↗
U.S. Energy Information AdministrationU.S. Energy Information Administration ↗
Historical recordHistorical Upward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol ending stocks: 23743.0 thousand_barrels for 2026-10-02

A weekly ethanol inventory decrease may indicate less product accumulation and firmer processor margins, potentially supporting corn demand.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Stocks also reflect refinery/seasonal timing; output rose in the latest period and no margin or demand series is joined.

A weekly ethanol inventory decrease may indicate less product accumulation and firmer processor margins, potentially supporting corn demand.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKSEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
ObservedMixed?
World maize production forecast — World
Fact & assessment

FAO-AMIS revised its 2026/27 world maize production forecast from 1309.1 to 1302.0 million tonnes in Market Monitor No. 142 (2026-10-02); page 4 reports a -7.157 million-tonne change.

Lower production forecast is a supply-tightening input; utilization and exports also fell in the same report while ending stocks were nearly flat, so the net world-balance implication is mixed.

Price confidence: medium

Counter-case: Demand/utilization and trade downgrades offset the smaller crop; stocks changed only slightly; a report revision does not establish a futures surprise.

Lower production forecast is a supply-tightening input; utilization and exports also fell in the same report while ending stocks were nearly flat, so the net world-balance implication is mixed.

Next check: Next AMIS Market Monitor revision; Material change to world demand, production, stocks or trade estimates

World · AMIS MARKET MONITOR ↗
AMIS MARKET MONITORAMIS MARKET MONITOR ↗
ObservedMixed?
Conab brazil corn second crop production — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab_brazil_corn_second_crop_production: 113254.5 thousand_metric_tons for 2026-10-01

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Price confidence: medium

Counter-case: The output is a first forecast, not realized production; high exports and a 14.9 Mt carryover-stock projection also shape exportable availability.

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
ObservedUpward?
Conab brazil corn second crop yield — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab_brazil_corn_second_crop_yield: 6126.303933660056 kilograms_per_hectare for 2026-10-01

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Area expansion and domestic use/export demand alter the net balance; first forecast yield is uncertain.

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
ObservedDownward?
Conab brazil corn first crop area — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab_brazil_corn_first_crop_area: 4540.200000000001 thousand_hectares for 2026-10-01

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: CONAB forecasts lower yield in the same early outlook; area planted is not harvested area, production or export availability, and domestic use is also projected higher.

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
ObservedMixed?
Conab brazil corn first crop production — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab_brazil_corn_first_crop_production: 32102.5 thousand_metric_tons for 2026-10-01

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Price confidence: medium

Counter-case: The output is a first forecast, not realized production; high exports and a 14.9 Mt carryover-stock projection also shape exportable availability.

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
ObservedUpward?
Conab brazil corn first crop yield — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab_brazil_corn_first_crop_yield: 7070.706620853705 kilograms_per_hectare for 2026-10-01

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Area expansion and domestic use/export demand alter the net balance; first forecast yield is uncertain.

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
ObservedDownward?
Conab brazil corn second crop area — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab_brazil_corn_second_crop_area: 18486.600000000002 thousand_hectares for 2026-10-01

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: CONAB forecasts lower yield in the same early outlook; area planted is not harvested area, production or export availability, and domestic use is also projected higher.

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
ObservedPrice direction undetermined
USDA October forecast puts U.S. corn production at 16,033,944 thousand bushels
Fact & assessment

USDA NASS reported an October 1, 2026 forecast of U.S. corn production of 16,033,944 thousand bushels.

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: This report is a production forecast, not realized output; it does not establish demand, stocks, export availability or the market's prior expectations.

This report is a production forecast, not realized output; it does not establish demand, stocks, export availability or the market's prior expectations.

Next check: A newer official source vintage; Next scheduled source release

United States · USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics ServiceUSDA National Agricultural Statistics Service ↗
ObservedPrice direction undetermined
Us corn harvested area — United States national total
Fact & assessment

us_corn_harvested_area: 88506.0 thousand_acres for 2026-10-01

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: This report is a production forecast, not realized output; it does not establish demand, stocks, export availability or the market's prior expectations.

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORNUSDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
ObservedPrice direction undetermined
Us corn yield — United States national total
Fact & assessment

us_corn_yield: 181.2 bushels_per_acre for 2026-10-01

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: This report is a production forecast, not realized output; it does not establish demand, stocks, export availability or the market's prior expectations.

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORNUSDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
USDA FAS reports 1,597.8 thousand metric tons of weekly U.S. corn exports
Fact & assessment

For the week ending October 1, 2026, USDA FAS reported U.S. corn exports of 1,597.8 thousand metric tons.

The archived fact is verifiable, but the required current comparator or price-relevant linked data are absent.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Next check: A newer official source vintage; Next scheduled source release

United States · USDA Foreign Agricultural Service ↗
USDA Foreign Agricultural ServiceUSDA Foreign Agricultural Service ↗
Historical recordHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Outstanding sales — United States
Fact & assessment

outstanding sales: 12141.5 thousand_metric_tons; United States; 2026-10-01.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Commitments are not port inspections or customs shipments; cancellations, destination changes, futures expectations, domestic demand and competing origins can offset.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORNUSDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Net sales — United States
Fact & assessment

net sales: 769.5 thousand_metric_tons; United States; 2026-10-01.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Commitments are not port inspections or customs shipments; cancellations, destination changes, futures expectations, domestic demand and competing origins can offset.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORNUSDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Accumulated exports — United States
Fact & assessment

accumulated exports: 7401.6 thousand_metric_tons; United States; 2026-10-01.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Commitments are not port inspections or customs shipments; cancellations, destination changes, futures expectations, domestic demand and competing origins can offset.

Export sales are direct U.S. corn demand/flow observations, but shipment, new-sales and outstanding-sales metrics can move in different directions in one report.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
USDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORNUSDA FAS EXPORT SALES CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dented — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: progress_dented 96.0 percent at 2026-09-27; comparator difference +6.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dented — United States, Minnesota
Fact & assessment

Minnesota: progress_dented 98.0 percent at 2026-09-27; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Minnesota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dented — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: progress_dented 97.0 percent at 2026-09-27; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dented — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: progress_dented 93.0 percent at 2026-09-27; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical Upward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol ending stocks: 23865.0 thousand_barrels for 2026-09-25

A weekly ethanol inventory decrease may indicate less product accumulation and firmer processor margins, potentially supporting corn demand.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Stocks also reflect refinery/seasonal timing; output rose in the latest period and no margin or demand series is joined.

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKSEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
Historical recordHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol production — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol production: 1007.0 thousand_barrels_per_day for 2026-09-25

Lower ethanol output is directionally consistent with less processor activity and potentially less corn grind.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTIONEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
Historical recordHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol production — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol production: 1028.0 thousand_barrels_per_day for 2026-09-18

Lower ethanol output is directionally consistent with less processor activity and potentially less corn grind.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTIONEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
Historical recordHistorical Upward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol ending stocks: 24683.0 thousand_barrels for 2026-09-18

A weekly ethanol inventory decrease may indicate less product accumulation and firmer processor margins, potentially supporting corn demand.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Stocks also reflect refinery/seasonal timing; output rose in the latest period and no margin or demand series is joined.

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKSEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Us fuel ethanol production — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol production: 1099.0 thousand_barrels_per_day for 2026-09-11

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTIONEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
Historical recordHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol ending stocks: 25220.0 thousand_barrels for 2026-09-11

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Stocks also reflect refinery/seasonal timing; output rose in the latest period and no margin or demand series is joined.

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKSEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dough — United States, South Dakota
Fact & assessment

South Dakota: progress_dough 100.0 percent at 2026-09-06; comparator difference +5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, South Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dough — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: progress_dough 96.0 percent at 2026-09-06; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dough — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: progress_dough 93.0 percent at 2026-09-06; comparator difference +5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dough — United States, Minnesota
Fact & assessment

Minnesota: progress_dough 98.0 percent at 2026-09-06; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Minnesota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dough — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: progress_dough 99.0 percent at 2026-09-06; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dough — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: progress_dough 100.0 percent at 2026-09-06; comparator difference +6.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress dough — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: progress_dough 96.0 percent at 2026-09-06; comparator difference +9.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol ending stocks: 25187.0 thousand_barrels for 2026-09-04

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Stocks also reflect refinery/seasonal timing; output rose in the latest period and no margin or demand series is joined.

A weekly ethanol inventory decrease may indicate less product accumulation and firmer processor margins, potentially supporting corn demand.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKSEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
Historical recordHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol production — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol production: 1099.0 thousand_barrels_per_day for 2026-09-04

Lower ethanol output is directionally consistent with less processor activity and potentially less corn grind.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTIONEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
ObservedPrice direction undetermined
Us corn on-farm stocks — United States national total
Fact & assessment

US corn on-farm stocks: 787.0 million_bushels for 2026-09-01

The source verifies on-farm/off-farm levels but supplies no like-for-like year-ago comparison for this subcomponent in the headline.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Total stocks rose 35% year over year and disappearance rose; storage location alone does not identify futures direction.

The source verifies on-farm/off-farm levels but supplies no like-for-like year-ago comparison for this subcomponent in the headline.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORNUSDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
ObservedUpward?
Us corn indicated disappearance — United States national total
Fact & assessment

US corn indicated disappearance: 3.2 billion_bushels for 2026-09-01

June-August disappearance was 3.20 billion bushels versus 3.10 billion a year earlier, a demand-supportive increase.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Disappearance is a residual use/flow measure and the same release reports total stocks up 35% year over year.

June-August disappearance was 3.20 billion bushels versus 3.10 billion a year earlier, a demand-supportive increase.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORNUSDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
ObservedPrice direction undetermined
Us corn off-farm stocks — United States national total
Fact & assessment

US corn off-farm stocks: 1.31 billion_bushels for 2026-09-01

The source verifies on-farm/off-farm levels but supplies no like-for-like year-ago comparison for this subcomponent in the headline.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Total stocks rose 35% year over year and disappearance rose; storage location alone does not identify futures direction.

The source verifies on-farm/off-farm levels but supplies no like-for-like year-ago comparison for this subcomponent in the headline.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORNUSDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
ObservedMixed?
Us corn stocks in all positions — United States national total
Fact & assessment

US corn stocks in all positions: 2.1 billion_bushels for 2026-09-01

September 1 total corn stocks are up 35% year over year, a large available-supply cushion, while June-August disappearance is also up 3.2% year over year.

Price confidence: medium

Counter-case: The inventory overhang weighs against price, but stronger disappearance supports demand; both are one official quarterly snapshot.

September 1 total corn stocks are up 35% year over year, a large available-supply cushion, while June-August disappearance is also up 3.2% year over year.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
USDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORNUSDA NASS GRAIN STOCKS CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Us corn harvested area — United States national total
Fact & assessment

us_corn_harvested_area: 88506.0 thousand_acres for 2026-09-01

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: This report is a production forecast, not realized output; it does not establish demand, stocks, export availability or the market's prior expectations.

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORNUSDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Us corn yield — United States national total
Fact & assessment

us_corn_yield: 178.5 bushels_per_acre for 2026-09-01

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: This report is a production forecast, not realized output; it does not establish demand, stocks, export availability or the market's prior expectations.

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORNUSDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Us corn production — United States national total
Fact & assessment

us_corn_production: 15799759.0 thousand_bushels for 2026-09-01

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: This report is a production forecast, not realized output; it does not establish demand, stocks, export availability or the market's prior expectations.

The official forecast revisions point in opposite directions across comparator horizons: larger than the previous forecast but below prior-year production.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States national total · USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
USDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORNUSDA NASS CROP PRODUCTION CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Conab brazil corn second crop area — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab brazil corn second crop area: 17824.9 thousand_hectares; Brazil national total; 2026-09-01.

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: CONAB forecasts lower yield in the same early outlook; area planted is not harvested area, production or export availability, and domestic use is also projected higher.

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Conab brazil corn first crop yield — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab brazil corn first crop yield: 7190.911210281172 kilograms_per_hectare; Brazil national total; 2026-09-01.

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Area expansion and domestic use/export demand alter the net balance; first forecast yield is uncertain.

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Conab brazil corn second crop production — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab brazil corn second crop production: 112130.8 thousand_metric_tons; Brazil national total; 2026-09-01.

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Price confidence: medium

Counter-case: The output is a first forecast, not realized production; high exports and a 14.9 Mt carryover-stock projection also shape exportable availability.

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Conab brazil corn second crop yield — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab brazil corn second crop yield: 6290.68589445102 kilograms_per_hectare; Brazil national total; 2026-09-01.

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Area expansion and domestic use/export demand alter the net balance; first forecast yield is uncertain.

A lower expected yield constrains supply potential and, all else equal, supports corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical Mixed?Historical assessment
Conab brazil corn first crop production — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab brazil corn first crop production: 29487.8 thousand_metric_tons; Brazil national total; 2026-09-01.

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Price confidence: medium

Counter-case: The output is a first forecast, not realized production; high exports and a 14.9 Mt carryover-stock projection also shape exportable availability.

The official first outlook expects corn production up 2.4% and planted area up 4.9%, while domestic use grows 6.6%; supply expansion and demand expansion offset.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Conab brazil corn first crop area — Brazil national total
Fact & assessment

conab brazil corn first crop area: 4100.7 thousand_hectares; Brazil national total; 2026-09-01.

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: CONAB forecasts lower yield in the same early outlook; area planted is not harvested area, production or export availability, and domestic use is also projected higher.

More planted area raises supply capacity and, all else equal, is bearish for corn price pressure.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

Brazil national total · CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
CONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORNCONAB BRAZIL SECOND CROP CORN ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
CONAB September estimate lists Brazil's second-crop corn production at 112,130.8 thousand metric tons
Fact & assessment

CONAB's September 2026 estimate for the 2025/26 crop season lists Brazil's second-crop corn production at 112,130.8 thousand metric tons.

The archived fact is verifiable, but the required current comparator or price-relevant linked data are absent.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Other supply, demand, stocks, processing and logistics can offset.

Next check: A newer official source vintage; Next scheduled source release

Brazil, second crop · Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB) ↗
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB)Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB) ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: monthly_mean_temperature 68.8 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +3.7.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Indiana
Fact & assessment

Indiana: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 82.6 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +4.7.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Indiana · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Minnesota
Fact & assessment

Minnesota: monthly_mean_temperature 62.1 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +3.5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Minnesota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Kansas
Fact & assessment

Kansas: monthly_mean_temperature 77.3 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +8.5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Kansas · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, South Dakota
Fact & assessment

South Dakota: monthly_precipitation 3.23 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference +1.32.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, South Dakota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Indiana
Fact & assessment

Indiana: monthly_mean_temperature 71.5 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +5.5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Indiana · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, Iowa
Fact & assessment

Iowa: monthly_precipitation 7.83 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference +4.35.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Iowa · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 73.0 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +2.4.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, Kansas
Fact & assessment

Kansas: monthly_precipitation 4.06 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference +1.54.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Kansas · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, South Dakota
Fact & assessment

South Dakota: monthly_mean_temperature 65.6 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +4.1.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, South Dakota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: monthly_mean_temperature 77.0 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +8.8.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Iowa
Fact & assessment

Iowa: monthly_mean_temperature 68.3 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +4.6.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Iowa · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Minnesota
Fact & assessment

Minnesota: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 71.8 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Minnesota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Nebraska
Fact & assessment

Nebraska: monthly_mean_temperature 69.2 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +5.4.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Nebraska · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, Nebraska
Fact & assessment

Nebraska: monthly_precipitation 3.78 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference +1.67.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Nebraska · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 83.6 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +5.1.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Nebraska
Fact & assessment

Nebraska: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 79.6 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Nebraska · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 73.2 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +2.1.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Illinois
Fact & assessment

Illinois: monthly_mean_temperature 73.0 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +6.2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Illinois · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: monthly_precipitation 3.01 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference +1.14.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: monthly_precipitation 2.82 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference -1.05.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: monthly_precipitation 5.14 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference +1.84.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Missouri
Fact & assessment

Missouri: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 88.3 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +8.5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Missouri · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: monthly_mean_temperature 62.8 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +3.3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Kansas
Fact & assessment

Kansas: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 89.0 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +7.1.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Kansas · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean temperature — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: monthly_mean_temperature 61.7 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +3.8.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly precipitation — United States, Minnesota
Fact & assessment

Minnesota: monthly_precipitation 4.45 inch at 2026-09; comparator difference +1.33.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Minnesota · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Monthly mean daily max temperature — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: monthly_mean_daily_max_temperature 78.9 degF at 2026-09; comparator difference +2.3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
WWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOVWWW.NCEI.NOAA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical Downward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol production — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol production: 1110.0 thousand_barrels_per_day; United States; 2026-08-28.

Lower ethanol output is directionally consistent with less processor activity and potentially less corn grind.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Ethanol output is not corn grind; margins, plant stocks, blend demand and other feedstocks may offset.

Higher ethanol output is directionally consistent with more processor activity and potentially more corn grind.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTIONEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION ↗
Historical recordHistorical Upward?Historical assessment
Us fuel ethanol ending stocks — United States
Fact & assessment

US fuel ethanol ending stocks: 25035.0 thousand_barrels; United States; 2026-08-28.

A weekly ethanol inventory decrease may indicate less product accumulation and firmer processor margins, potentially supporting corn demand.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: Stocks also reflect refinery/seasonal timing; output rose in the latest period and no margin or demand series is joined.

A weekly ethanol inventory increase may indicate product accumulation and weaker processor margins, potentially limiting corn demand.

Next check: next official release or source revision; material change in price-relevant supply, demand, stock, processing, transport or export evidence

United States · EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
EIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKSEIA WEEKLY FUEL ETHANOL STOCKS ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress silking — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: progress_silking 100.0 percent at 2026-08-16; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress silking — United States, South Dakota
Fact & assessment

South Dakota: progress_silking 100.0 percent at 2026-08-16; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, South Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress silking — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: progress_silking 97.0 percent at 2026-08-16; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress silking — United States, Nebraska
Fact & assessment

Nebraska: progress_silking 96.0 percent at 2026-08-16; comparator difference -2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Nebraska · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress emerged — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: progress_emerged 97.0 percent at 2026-06-21; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress emerged — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: progress_emerged 96.0 percent at 2026-06-21; comparator difference +5.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress emerged — United States, South Dakota
Fact & assessment

South Dakota: progress_emerged 100.0 percent at 2026-06-21; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, South Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress planted — United States, Wisconsin
Fact & assessment

Wisconsin: progress_planted 97.0 percent at 2026-06-07; comparator difference +3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Wisconsin · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress planted — United States, North Dakota
Fact & assessment

North Dakota: progress_planted 98.0 percent at 2026-06-07; comparator difference +6.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, North Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress planted — United States, South Dakota
Fact & assessment

South Dakota: progress_planted 99.0 percent at 2026-06-07; comparator difference +2.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, South Dakota · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Historical recordHistorical assessmentPrice direction undetermined
Progress planted — United States, Ohio
Fact & assessment

Ohio: progress_planted 89.0 percent at 2026-06-07; comparator difference -3.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Price confidence: low

Counter-case: State monthly precipitation, monthly mean temperature, monthly mean daily maximum temperature and USDM drought area are joined only to USDA NASS stage/condition rows from the same state, crop year and overlapping calendar month. Monthly overlap is contextual, not crop-area-weighted exposure or causal attribution. Irrigation, within-month timing, later harvest, global supply and feed substitution can offset.

The state/month observation is a real crop/weather context fact, but state-area weather is not corn-acreage-weighted and does not establish production or a CBOT price effect.

Next check: Do not revive the old price assessment by changing its date.; Reassess only with fresh source observations and current same-state/crop-year stage, crop-area exposure, and official yield/production evidence.

United States, Ohio · ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
ESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOVESMIS.NAL.USDA.GOV ↗
Source coverage & limitations
  • U.S. crop production is an October forecast, not final realized output.
  • U.S. Drought Monitor statistics measure CONUS area rather than corn-acreage drought exposure.
  • CONAB's September estimate keeps Brazilian first- and second-crop corn separate.
  • USDA FAS Export Sales figures are reported sales and exports, not port-level shipment observations.
  • EIA fuel ethanol output is an output indicator, not a direct measure of corn grind or corn demand.
  • No reviewed, redistributable corn map features are included in this feed.